Showing posts with label Bible Geek. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bible Geek. Show all posts

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Health Care Reform - I would like to congratulate Barack Obama in his victory over the American people

Hello socialism, nice to meet you.


All I have to say right now is 

John 11:35

Jesus wept.

Out of sympathy with those who were in tears all around him, as well as from a deep sense of the misery sin had brought upon human nature.


and Matthew 15:13-14
He said in reply, "Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be uprooted.
Let them alone; they are blind guides (of the blind). If a blind person leads a blind person, both will fall into a pit."
Footnote from USCCB: [13-14] Jesus leads his disciples away from the teaching authority of the Pharisees.

and Galatians 6:7-8

Make no mistake: God is not mocked, for a person will reap only what he sows,
because the one who sows for his flesh will reap corruption from the flesh, but the one who sows for the spirit will reap eternal life from the spirit.


See who voted yes and no here.
And is this just a political ploy or is this for real?
I asked a person much more knowledgeable than I and here was the answer.
The Congress that enacted the bill is unlikely to vote to repeal it and even if that miracle happened, the President would veto and there certainly is no super majority to override.

THE REAL ARITHMETIC OF HEALTH CARE REFORM  NYTimes.com

Sunday, December 27, 2009

How Are the Gospels Different?

The four canonical Gospels (that’s the four that we have in the Bible) – Matthew, Mark, Luke and John – are very similar but also quite different. In each of the gospels we receive a different “portrait” of Jesus. What I mean by that is that each one communicates something different about Jesus – different approaches and messages about the same God, if that makes sense. The word gospel literally means “good news”. We are given the word in the very beginning of Mark’s work: “The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ (the Son of God).” - Mark 1:1


Matthew, Mark and Luke are known as the synoptic gospels. Syn meaning “alike” (as in “synonym”), optic meaning “view” (as in optical allusion or optometrist). The three synoptic gospels give a similar view of Jesus, a little distinctive from St. John’s fourth (and last) gospel. One recognizable difference is that St. John’s gospel doesn’t have pure parables, as the other three have.
What you will find as you read and pray through the other three gospels, however, is that what each saint is communicating about Jesus is very different. And that’s a good thing. Those differences should make us feel even better about the Gospel – if they were too similar, many would think it was all just “copying” and that, perhaps, only one person really thought these things.
The four Gospel authors come from different backgrounds, wrote to different audiences, transcribed their gospels at different times and focused on different aspects of Jesus’ ministry, life and mission.
Many Biblical scholars spend their entire lives trying to prove that Mark was written after Matthew, or that there is another source (called “Q”) that was used (in addition to Mark) as a sort of “template” (outline) for both Matthew and Luke. And while those are some really interesting debates and conversations to get into someday, if you really want to, it’s probably far more important for you to focus on the here and now, as you read through the rest.
Here’s a little BACKGROUND on each, to help you on your way.

Matthew and John were part of the original twelve apostles (Mt. 9:9, Jn. 21:24). ~~~~>
Mark
and Luke were not part of the original twelve.
Mark was a young disciple of Jesus’, traveled with St. Paul (Acts 12:25) and was close with St. Peter (1 Pet. 5:13).
Luke was a physician who spent a great deal of time with St. Paul. (Col 4:14, Phl. 1:24 and 2 Tim. 4:11). Luke also wrote the Acts of the Apostles.

Audience

Matthew is writing to Jewish Christians of Palestine.
Possibly originally written in Hebrew (i.e., the Aramaic dialect), and afterwards translated into Greek, either by Matthew himself or by some person unknown. Though Matthew wrote mainly for the Jews, most were familiar with the Greek language.

Mark is written for a Roman audience.
We know this because there are no allusions
to Jewish Law, or references to Jewish culture like there are in the other Gospels. This
Gospel was written primarily for a group of people who did not know Christ first hand.

Luke is writing to all non-Jewish readers, but especially Greeks who know very little about the Jewish faith.
We know this because he translates all the Hebrew and Aramaic terms into Greek as well as explaining the Jewish Laws, customs and geography. It’s also important to remember that the Greeks admired human perfection and so Luke often shows Jesus as the perfect answer to their quest…the IDEAL.

John is writing to the early Church, close to the end of the First Century.
This Gospel had a much more universal audience (not necessarily for a particular group of people) than the other Gospels.
<~~~ about the image: "Carpet Pages" were purely decorative, and were so named for their resemblance to eastern carpets. This carpet page from Folio 27v of the Book of Kells depicts the symbols for the four evangelists: Matthew the Man Mark the Lion Luke the Calf (or Bull) John the Eagle (derived from the vision of Ezekiel)

Datelines

Matthew - written before the destruction of Jerusalem (Matt. 24) which was in 70AD, and some time after the events it records. The probability is that it was written between the years A.D. 60 and 65.
Mark
- Just before or just after the destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D., probably about 63 AD.
Luke
- It was more than likely written between the years 80-90.
John
- Around 90-95 AD, there is great evidence to support this dateline.

Central Themes

Matthew - The central theme is Christ the Messiah and King came to establish a Church.
Mark
- The central theme is on action and service, more than teaching.
Luke
- The central theme is liberation and healing
John
- The central theme is the identity of Jesus, the reality of the Sacramental Church
My hope and prayer is that you would read and pray all four, taking your time as you do. And once you finish with St. John, go back and begin through St. Matthew’s again. You can spend the rest of your life in just the four gospels and they will ever get stale, that’s the beauty (and depth) of God’s work.


Source:  The Bible Geek over @ Holy Spirit Interactive Youth
Re-post from 5-29-2008

Thursday, May 29, 2008

How Are The Gospels Different?

A great answer from The Bible Geek over @ Holy Spirit Interactive Youth.
"The four canonical Gospels (that’s the four that we have in the Bible) – Matthew, Mark, Luke and John – are very similar but also quite different. In each of the gospels we receive a different “portrait” of Jesus. What I mean by that is that each one communicates something different about Jesus – different approaches and messages about the same God, if that makes sense.
The word gospel literally means “good news”. We are given the word in the very beginning of Mark’s work: “The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ (the Son of God).” - Mark 1:1

Matthew, Mark and Luke are known as the synoptic gospels. Syn meaning “alike” (as in “synonym”), optic meaning “view” (as in optical allusion or optometrist). The three synoptic gospels give a similar view of Jesus, a little distinctive from St. John’s fourth (and last) gospel. One recognizable difference is that St. John’s gospel doesn’t have pure parables, as the other three have.
What you will find as you read and pray through the other three gospels, however, is that what each saint is communicating about Jesus is very different. And that’s a good thing. Those differences should make us feel even better about the Gospel – if they were too similar, many would think it was all just “copying” and that, perhaps, only one person really thought these things.
The four Gospel authors come from different backgrounds, wrote to different audiences, transcribed their gospels at different times and focused on different aspects of Jesus’ ministry, life and mission.
Many Biblical scholars spend their entire lives trying to prove that Mark was written after Matthew, or that there is another source (called “Q”) that was used (in addition to Mark) as a sort of “template” (outline) for both Matthew and Luke. And while those are some really interesting debates and conversations to get into someday, if you really want to, it’s probably far more important for you to focus on the here and now, as you read through the rest.
Here’s a little BACKGROUND on each, to help you on your way.

Matthew and John were part of the original twelve apostles (Mt. 9:9, Jn. 21:24). ~~~~>
Mark
and Luke were not part of the original twelve.
Mark was a young disciple of Jesus’, traveled with St. Paul (Acts 12:25) and was close with St. Peter (1 Pet. 5:13).
Luke was a physician who spent a great deal of time with St. Paul. (Col 4:14, Phl. 1:24 and 2 Tim. 4:11). Luke also wrote the Acts of the Apostles.

Audience

Matthew is writing to Jewish Christians of Palestine.
Possibly originally written in Hebrew (i.e., the Aramaic dialect), and afterwards translated into Greek, either by Matthew himself or by some person unknown. Though Matthew wrote mainly for the Jews, most were familiar with the Greek language.

Mark is written for a Roman audience.
We know this because there are no allusions
to Jewish Law, or references to Jewish culture like there are in the other Gospels. This
Gospel was written primarily for a group of people who did not know Christ first hand.
Luke is writing to all non-Jewish readers, but especially Greeks who know very little about the Jewish faith.
We know this because he translates all the Hebrew and Aramaic terms into Greek as well as explaining the Jewish Laws, customs and geography. It’s also important to remember that the Greeks admired human perfection and so Luke often shows Jesus as the perfect answer to their quest…the IDEAL.
John is writing to the early Church, close to the end of the First Century.
This Gospel had a much more universal audience (not necessarily for a particular group of people) than the other Gospels.
<~~~ about the image: "Carpet Pages" were purely decorative, and were so named for their resemblance to eastern carpets. This carpet page from Folio 27v of the Book of Kells depicts the symbols for the four evangelists: Matthew the Man Mark the Lion Luke the Calf (or Bull) John the Eagle (derived from the vision of Ezekiel)

Datelines

Matthew - written before the destruction of Jerusalem (Matt. 24) which was in 70AD, and some time after the events it records. The probability is that it was written between the years A.D. 60 and 65.
Mark
- Just before or just after the destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D., probably about 63 AD.
Luke
- It was more than likely written between the years 80-90.
John
- Around 90-95 AD, there is great evidence to support this dateline.

Central Themes

Matthew - The central theme is Christ the Messiah and King came to establish a Church.
Mark
- The central theme is on action and service, more than teaching.
Luke
- The central theme is liberation and healing
John
- The central theme is the identity of Jesus, the reality of the Sacramental Church
My hope and prayer is that you would read and pray all four, taking your time as you do. And once you finish with St. John, go back and begin through St. Matthew’s again. You can spend the rest of your life in just the four gospels and they will ever get stale, that’s the beauty (and depth) of God’s work."

Saturday, May 3, 2008

What Scriptures Explain the Catholic Faith?

A great answer from The Bible Geek over @ Holy Spirit Interactive Youth.

"There are countless websites and books available that will go into very exhaustive detail about what we believe as Catholics and where you can find our beliefs (or the foundation of our beliefs) within the Sacred Scriptures. Also, when looking for a specific verse about specific themes, you should get your hands on a concordance.

As I've mentioned many times before, the Catholic Church put the Bible together. The Church didn't come out of the (written) Gospel(s), the Gospels came out of the Church. The Scriptures weren't written for a couple decades following the Resurrection. In addition, the New Testament wasn't compiled until a few hundred years later (in its canonical form).

Our Church believes that the Bible is one source (not the only source) of Divine Revelation. The Sacred Scriptures work "in conjunction" with the living, oral Tradition of the Church, lived by Christ and His apostles and entrusted to the Church through the power and protection of the Holy Spirit.

With that in mind, here's a “quick reference” guide to which Scriptures you can use, to explain in greater Scriptural detail, some of what we believe as Roman Catholics.

This is in no way complete, it's a brief list of ten Catholic doctrines/disciplines you’ll probably be questioned most about and some of the verses it will help you to know when explaining the faith:

1. The Blessed Virgin Mary – Her perpetual Virginity and Her place of honor
• Lk 1:28
• Lk 1:30, 34
• Lk 1:42
• Jn 19:26
• Gn 3:15

2. The Papacy – where is that in the Bible?
• Mt 16:18-19
• Lk 22:32
• Jn 20:23, 21:17
• Acts 1:13-26
• Acts 8:21
• Acts 15:7, 28
• 1 Tim 3:1, 8
• 1 Tim 5:17

3. The Bible and Tradition (why the “Bible alone” is anti-Scriptural)
• Mk 13:31
• Mk 16:15
• Jn 21:25
• Rom 10:17
• 1 Cor 11:2
• 2 Thess 2:15, 3:6
• 2 Tim 1:13, 2:2
• 2 Pet 1:20

4. Faith and Works - (not by faith alone)
• Mt 19:16-17
• Jn 14:15
• Rom 2:5-8
• 1 Cor 13:2
• Gal 5:6
• Eph 2:8-10
• Col 3:24-25
• Jam 2:24-26
• Rev 20:12-13

5. Eucharist – it’s Scriptural
• Mt 26:26
• Jn 1:29
• Jn 6:35-71
• 1 Cor 2:14-3:4
• 1 Cor 5:7, 10:16
• 1 Cor 11:23-29
• Ex 12:8, 46

6. Purgatory – it’s Scriptural, too
• Mt 5:26, 48
• Mt 12:32-36
• 1 Cor 3:15
• 1 Cor 15:29-30
• 2 Tim 1:16-18
• Jas 3:2
• 1 Pet 3:18-20, 4:6
• 1 Jn 5:16-17
• Rev 21-27
• 2 Macc 12:44-46

7. Mary and the Saints – why it’s okay to ask them to pray for us
• Lk 16:19-30
• Rom 8:35-39, 15:30
• 1 Cor 12:12-27
• Eph 6:18-19
• 1 Thess 1:5-8
• 1 Tim 2:1-7
• Heb 12:1, 13:7
• 1 Jn 3:2
• Gal 6:10

8. Reconciliation – why we go to a priest
• Mt 9:2-8
• Mt 18:18
• Jn 20:22-23
• 2 Cor 5:17-20
• Jas 5:13-16
• 1 Jn 5:16

9. Salvation (why “once saved, always saved” isn’t Biblical)
• Mt 7:21, 10:22
• Rom 8:24, 11:22
• 1 Cor 9:27, 10:11-12
• Gal 5:4
• Eph 2:5,8
• Phil 2:12
• 2 Tim 1:9, 2:11-13
• Heb 10:26-27
• 1 Pet 1:9

10. The Priesthood – celibacy and why we call them “father”
• Mt 19:19
• Lk 14:26
• Acts 7:2
• Acts 21:40, 22:1
• Rom 4:16-17
• 1 Cor 4:14-15
• 1 Thess 2:11
• Heb 12:7-9
• 1 Jn 2:13-14

Remember, the Roman Catholic Church has a long tradition...the longest Christian tradition. We are the only Church founded by Christ, Himself (Mt. 16:16-20). Take some time to thank God for that gift of His Church and for the grace that you were born into through your conception, His cross, your Baptism and the Sacraments.

God loved you enough to give you a Church, to help you attain sainthood.

He's covered all the bases.

Stay God's!"

Blog Widget by LinkWithin